Why Taking the White House Online Does Not Make It More Accessible To The Public

By Leah C. Campbell
2015, Vol. 7 No. 02 | pg. 4/4 |

Conclusion

President Obama has worked tirelessly to advance the use of internet to engage the public in , however the nature of the office and the long-standing security commitments thereafter are as of yet not compatible with the tremendous level of direct communication made possible by and the like.

In order for the federal government to have an impactful digital presence, sites like whitehouse.gov/engage need better design and regulation. Government webpages face many of the same critiques as the immensely troubled healthcare.gov whose repeated crashes and inability to host the quantity of users for which it was designed cost the Obama administration public support of the Affordable Care Act as a whole. These sites can’t stand up to the technology provided by private companies or indeed those used by President Obama’s own campaigns. A 2013 New York Times article asked,

“So why is it that the technology available to Mr. Obama as president doesn’t compare to the technology he used to win an election? Much of the problem has to do with the way the government buys things. The government has to follow a code called the Federal Acquisition Regulation, which is more than 1,800 pages of legalese that all but ensure that the companies that win government contracts, like the ones put out to build HealthCare.gov, are those that can navigate the regulations best, but not necessarily do the best job.”33

Contracting companies is wrought with problems because contractual negotiations are so heavily restricted. Yet having in-house web development teams is problematic as well. Salaries in public office are notoriously uncompetitive, especially compared to those offered by political campaigns making more money than ever before in the Super-PAC era. A slowly growing economy only compounds the pressure for young talented computer science professionals to continue turning to corporate behemoths like Google and Apple instead of public service careers with lengthy and invasive interview and screening processes.

The federal government faces multiple challenges towards achieving success in the digital realm, but the potential dividends cannot be ignored. Cynicism dominates the conversation among voters and increasing meaningful public engagement is one of the few ways to increase voter trust in a time of intense bipartisanship and congressional gridlock. President Ford utilized the Office of Public Liaison to increase public trust and transparency in his administration and President Obama attempted to do the same in governing through the Office of Public Engagement.

Effectively using Internet technology and social media were essential components in candidate Obama’s victories over established politicians in 2008. Logically he has tried in various capacities to apply those successes to his administration but at present, the Executive Office is incompatible with the demands of a 21st century media strategy.


References

Ayandele, Bim. “Helping Launch the White House Office of Public Engagement” Winner & Associates, an MSL Group Company. Last updated 2009. Accessed December 1, 2014. http://www.winnerandassociates.com/reflections2.aspx

"Be a Part of the Next Four Years," YouTube video, 3:14, Posted by "The White House," upload January 19, 2013, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yl8pgMSZvHc

Carr, David. “How Obama Tapped Into Social Networks’ .”New York Times. November 9, 2008. Accessed December 1, 2014. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/business/media/10carr.html?_r=0

CNN. “Election Tracker 2008: Fundraising” Last modified October 15, 2008. http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/map/fundraising/ Accessed December 1, 2014.

Cogburn, Derrick L. and Fatima K. Espinoza-Vasquez. “From Networked Nominee to Networked Nation: Examining the Impact of Web 2.0 and Social Media on Political Participation and Civic Engagement in the 2008 Obama Campaign.” Journal of Political Marketing 10(2011). 189-213 Accessed November 17, 2014. doi: 10.1080/153.77857.2011.540224

FactCheck. “Average Campaign Contributions” Last modified July 15, 2008. http://www.factcheck.org/2008/07/average-campaign-contributions/ Accessed December 1, 2014.

Fox, Zoe. “The Digital Smackdown: Obama 2008 vs. Obama 2012.” Mashable. September 23, 2012. http://mashable.com/2012/09/23/obama-digitial-comparison/ Accessed December 1, 2014.

Future Thinking. “The knowledge to change our world for good” CNN. Last updated November 6, 2014. Accessed December 1, 2014. http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20141105-the-knowledge-to-do-good

Gallup. “Presidential Approval Ratings -- .” Last updated November 23, 2014. http://www.gallup.com/poll/116479/barack-obama-presidential-job-approval.aspx accessed December 1, 2014.

Greiling Keane, Angela. “Obama, Criticized in U.S., Promotes Open Government” Bloomberg. Last updated September 24, 2014. Accessed December 1, 2014. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-09-24/obama-criticized-in-u-s-promotes-open-government.html

Harris, Heather E., Kimberly R. Moffitt, and Catherine R. Squires. The Obama Effect, Multidisciplinary Renderings of the 2008 Campaign. New York: State University of New York Press, 2010.

Hansell, Saul. “Data.gov: Unlocking the Federal Filing Cabinets” The New York Times Bits Blog. May 22, 2009. Accessed December 1,2014. http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/22/datagov-unlocking-the-federal-filing-cabinets/?module=Search&mabReward=relbias%3Ar%2C%7B%221%22%3A%22RI%3A9%22%7D

Hunt, Karen M., and Charles E. Walcott. Empowering the White House: Governance Under Nixon, Ford, and Carter (Studies in Government and Public Policy) Kansas: University Press in Kansas, 2004.

Itkowitz, Colby. “Michael Brown petition has 100,000 signatures; the White House must respond” Washington Post. August 20, 2014. Accessed December 1, 2014. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/in-the-loop/wp/2014/08/20/michael-brown-petition-has-100000-signatures-the-white-house-must-respond/

Jacobs, Lawrence R. “The Privilege of Access: Interest Groups and the White House.” in The Obama Presidency, Appraisals and Prospects, ed Bert A. Rockman et al. (Washington: CQ Press, 2012), 149-170.

Johnson, Clay and Harper Reed, “Why the Government Never Gets Tech Right Getting to the Bottom of HealthCare.gov’s Flop” The New York Times, October 24, 2013, Accessed December 1, 2014. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/25/opinion/getting-to-the-bottom-of-healthcaregovs-flop.html

Kirkpatrick, Marshall. “Data.gov Now Live; Looks Nice But Short on Data.” ReadWrite. May 21, 2009. Accessed December 1, 2014. http://readwrite.com/2009/05/21/datagov_finally_launches_looks_nice_but_short_on_d

Nakamura, David, “The right to petition the White House prompts grievances, gags online” Washington Post, December 9, 2009, Accessed December 1, 2014. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/the-right-to-petition-the-white-house-prompts-grievances-gags-online/2012/12/09/c9adf3fc-3f10-11e2-ae43-cf491b837f7b_story.html

National Security Archives. “President Obama embraces openness on day one, as urged by the National Security Archive and a coalition of more than 60 organizations.” Last updated January 21, 2009. Accessed December 1, 2014. http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20090121/

Pika, Joseph A. “The White House Office of Public Liaison” Presidential Studies Quarterly 39(3) 2009: 549-573. Accessed December 1, 2014. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5705.2009.03690.x.

Sharp, Adam. “100 Senators and the 57th Inauguration.” Twitter Blog. January 18, 2013. https://blog.twitter.com/2013/100-senators-and-57th-inauguration Accessed December 1, 2014

Snead, John T. “Social media use in the U.S. Executive branch” Government Information Quarterly 30(2013): 58. Accessed December 1, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.09.001

Stone, Peter H., “Friends After All.” National Journal 26(43) 1994. Accessed December 1, 2014. doi: 02133013/200320271.

The White House, “Open Government Working Group” Last updated 2014, accessed December 1, 2014. http://www.whitehouse.gov/open/about/working-group

The White House. "The President’s Statement on Net Neutrality." Last modified November 10, 2014. < http://www.whitehouse.gov/net-neutrality >.

Zeleny, Jeff. “For a High-Tech President, a Hard-Fought E-Victory.” The New York Times. January 22, 2009. Accessed December 1, 2014. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/23/us/politics/23berry.html


Endnotes

1.) The White House, "The President’s Statement on Net Neutrality," The White House Office of Public Engagement, Last modified November 10, 2014, < http://www.whitehouse.gov/net-neutrality >.

2.) Joseph A. Pika, “The White House Office of Public Liaison,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 39(3) 2009: 555, Accessed December 1, 2014, doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5705.2009.03690.x.

3.) Karen M. Hunt and Charles E. Walcott, Empowering the White House: Governance Under Nixon, Ford, and Carter (Studies in Government and Public Policy) (Kansas: University Press in Kansas, 2004), 90-91.

4.) Hunt and Walcott, Empowering the White House, 91

5.) Lawrence R. Jacobs, “The Privilege of Access: Interest Groups and the White House,” in The Obama Presidency, Appraisals and Prospects, ed Bert A. Rockman et al. (Washington: CQ Press, 2012), 155.

6.) Jacobs, “The Privilege of Access” 160.

7.) Peter H. Stone, “Friends After All,” National Journal 26(43) 1994, Accessed December 1, 2014, doi: 02133013/200320271.

8.) David Carr, “How Obama Tapped Into Social Networks’ Power,”New York Times, November 9, 2008, accessed December 1, 2014, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/business/media/10carr.html?_r=0

9.) Heather E. Harris, Kimberly R. Moffitt, and Catherine R. Squires, The Obama Effect, Multidisciplinary Renderings of the 2008 Campaign, (New York: State University of New York Press, 2010,) 57.

10.) Harris, Moffitt and Squires, The Obama Effect, 71

11.) CNN. “Election Tracker 2008: Fundraising” Last modified October 15, 2008. http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/map/fundraising/ Accessed December 1, 2014.

12.) FactCheck, “Average Campaign Contributions,” Last modified July 15, 2008, http://www.factcheck.org/2008/07/average-campaign-contributions/ Accessed December 1, 2014.

13.) Harris, Moffitt and Squires, The Obama Effect, 81

14.) Zoe Fox, “The Digital Smackdown: Obama 2008 vs. Obama 2012” Mashable, September 23, 2012, http://mashable.com/2012/09/23/obama-digitial-comparison/ Accessed December 1, 2014.

15.) Adam Sharp, “100 Senators and the 57th Inauguration” Twitter Blog, January 18, 2013, https://blog.twitter.com/2013/100-senators-and-57th-inauguration Accessed December 1, 2014.

16.) Carr, “How Obama Tapped Into Social Networks’ Power”

17.) Derrick L. Cogburn and Fatima K. Espinoza-Vasquez, “From Networked Nominee to Networked Nation: Examining the Impact of Web 2.0 and Social Media on Political Participation and Civic Engagement in the 2008 Obama Campaign,” Journal of Political Marketing 10(2011): 199, Accessed November 17, 2014, doi: 10.1080/15377857.2011.540224

18.) Jeff Zeleny, “For a High-Tech President, a Hard-Fought E-Victory” The New York Times, January 22, 2009, accessed December 1, 2014, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/23/us/politics/23berry.html?_r=0

19.) Cogburn and Espinoza-Vasquez, “From Networked Nominee, to Networked Nation” 207.

20.) Gallup, “Presidential Approval Ratings -- Barack Obama” Last updated November 23, 2014. http://www.gallup.com/poll/116479/barack-obama-presidential-job-approval.aspx accessed December 1, 2014.

21.) John T. Snead, “Social media use in the U.S. Executive branch” Government Information Quarterly 30(2013): 58, Accessed December 1, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.09.001

22.) Snead, “Social media use in the U.S. Executive branch” 58.

23.) National Security Archives, “President Obama embraces openness on day one, as urged by the National Security Archive and a coalition of more than 60 organizations,” Last updated January 21, 2009. Accessed December 1, 2014, http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20090121/

24.) The White House, “Open Government Working Group” Last updated 2014, accessed December 1, 2014. http://www.whitehouse.gov/open/about/working-group

25.) Marshall Kirkpatrick, “Data.gov Now Live; Looks Nice But Short on Data,” ReadWrite, May 21, 2009, accessed December 1, 2014, http://readwrite.com/2009/05/21/datagov_finally_launches_looks_nice_but_short_on_d

26.) Saul Hansell, “Data.gov: Unlocking the Federal Filing Cabinets” The New York Times Bits Blog, May 22, 2009, accessed December 1,2014, http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/22/datagov-unlocking-the-federal-filing-cabinets/?module=Search&mabReward=relbias%3Ar%2C%7B%221%22%3A%22RI%3A9%22%7D

27.) Future Thinking, “The knowledge to change our world for good” CNN, November 6, 2014, Accessed December 1, 2014. http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20141105-the-knowledge-to-do-good

28.) Angela Greiling Keane, “Obama, Criticized in U.S., Promotes Open Government” Bloomberg, September 24, 2014, accessed December 1, 2014. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-09-24/obama-criticized-in-u-s-promotes-open-government.html

29.) Bim Ayandele “Helping Launch the White House Office of Public Engagement” Winner & Associates, an MSL Group Company, Last updated 2009, accessed December 1, 2014. http://www.winnerandassociates.com/reflections2.aspx

30.) Colby Itkowitz, “Michael Brown petition has 100,000 signatures; the White House must respond” Washington Post, August 20, 2014, Accessed December 1, 2014, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/in-the-loop/wp/2014/08/20/michael-brown-petition-has-100000-signatures-the-white-house-must-respond/

31.) "Be a Part of the Next Four Years," YouTube video, 3:14, Posted by "The White House," upload January 19, 2013, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yl8pgMSZvHc

32.) Nakamura, David, “The right to petition the White House prompts grievances, gags online” Washington Post, December 9, 2009, Accessed December 1, 2014. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/the-right-to-petition-the-white-house-prompts-grievances-gags-online/2012/12/09/c9adf3fc-3f10-11e2-ae43-cf491b837f7b_story.html

33.) Clay Johnson and Harper Reed, “Why the Government Never Gets Tech Right Getting to the Bottom of HealthCare.gov’s Flop” The New York Times, October 24, 2013, Accessed December 1, 2014. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/25/opinion/getting-to-the-bottom-of-healthcaregovs-flop.html

Suggested Reading from Inquiries Journal

Gun control and federal reform of firearm legislation have recently become popular and contentious topics in Washington D.C. and around the country. Yet despite vast public support, none of the legislation proposed by the Obama administration has been enacted. The Obama administration and the several Congresses that have served... MORE»
Advertisement
In 1972, The Equal Rights Amendment was first introduced to Congress to protect an individual’s irrefutable equality of rights under the law regardless of sex. Although it passed both houses and failed to secure the... MORE»
The presidential campaign of Barack Obama was met with enthusiasm and controversy. If you were alive and cognizant at the time, you understood the importance and historic value of the 2008 election no matter your position... MORE»
"If you wish to fault the administration, it's that we didn't have a clear picture, and we probably didn't do as clear a job explaining that we did not have a clear picture, until days later, creating what I think are legitimate... MORE»
Submit to Inquiries Journal, Get a Decision in 10-Days

Inquiries Journal provides undergraduate and graduate students around the world a platform for the wide dissemination of academic work over a range of core disciplines.

Representing the work of students from hundreds of institutions around the globe, Inquiries Journal's large database of academic articles is completely free. Learn more | Blog | Submit

Follow SP

Latest in Political Science

2014, Vol. 8 No. 1
In the late 1990's the spray-painted name "Banksy" began accompanying stenciled images throughout the cities of London and Bristol, England. Taking inspiration from the anarchic messages of punk music and hip-hop graffiti popularized by New York... Read Article »
2017, Vol. 9 No. 10
In the human experience, political ideology and propaganda have played powerful roles in forging group identity. In the evolution of the human species, beliefs have been as powerful as facts and truths. Knowledge of this research and political reality... Read Article »
2017, Vol. 9 No. 10
The United States government started exploring the soft power potential of student and scholar exchange programs as early as 1908, with the establishment of the Boxer Indemnity Scholarship Program.[1] The father of the theory of soft power, Joseph... Read Article »
2017, Vol. 9 No. 10
Political philosophers and theorists alike continue to debate if more enlightened populations would be of value or not. This piece will contribute to that dispute by claiming that an enlightened populace is integral to the progress of free-societies... Read Article »
2017, Vol. 9 No. 07
There has been extensive debate over the past few decades regarding the criteria by which we should measure distributive justice. In conceiving a just state of affairs it is imperative that we determine the most appropriate measure of the distributions... Read Article »
2017, Vol. 9 No. 06
Similarly to many European countries, the Swedish population often perceive their history as an epoch of homogeneity: a time when every Swedish citizen was believed to have had the same ethnic phenotype, spoken the same language, believed in the... Read Article »
2017, Vol. 7 No. 2
Published by Clocks and Clouds
Although terrorism has been present in the world for centuries, it is only since the 1980s that suicide terrorism has become an object of study for academics and an existing concern for government professionals. While discourses on suicide terrorism... Read Article »

What are you looking for?

FROM OUR BLOG

How to Read for Grad School
What is the Secret to Success?
How to Use Regression Analysis Effectively