Love in the Time of Pollution: A Look at Eco-Feminism Roots in Disney's "Wall-E"

By Cassandra A. Clarke
2010, Vol. 2 No. 03 | pg. 1/1

Despite critics’ assumption that WALL-E centers its plot upon an anti-pollution/sustainability theme, the writer Andrew Stanton never intended his movie to contain an environmental message. Instead, what he intended to do was create a movie that epitomizes the importance of human relations to the natural world. “What’s really important,” he says, “is relationships, everything else, the planet, benefits from that.” Set in a post-apocalyptic Earth, it ironically takes the love of two robots to reintroduce humans to the power of humane connections. Through observing EVA and WALL-E’s love, the artificially (and literally) plugged in humans in a space station realize just how disconnected they are from each other and the “natural” world and seek to reestablish life on Earth. Therefore, it is through Stanton’s idea of “humanness as connections to society,” acting as the force responsible for revitalizing the new Earth, that Stanton unknowingly applies “eco-social feminism” ideals to solve the environmental problem of productivity (Merchant, 207).

Eco-social feminists believe that “nothing in nature, takes place in isolation” (208). Everything is inherently and intrinsically connected to something else, and therefore any attempt at segmenting a material, or matter of life to manipulate without concern for the resulting consequences is exploitive. Traditionally founded in Marxist thought, they believe that nature is dominated because humans dominate each other through the value they place in “dualisms,”-slave/master, women/man, child/father, etc., and the organization of hierarchical structures of power (205). Structuring their environmental thought within a homocentric outlook, eco-social feminists believe that it is through reestablishing the connection between people in considerate terms that nature can once again be valued. If one abolishes power struggles in society, than society would be left to function on the socially just and equitable term of a communal setting. Nonhuman life would then be used as “essentials” of life, and not victims to means of a rapid growth of capitalism, or focus on productivity. The goal is to sustain life, and the quality of life, not material wealth nor any other means of expansion economics.

WALL-E’s world is representative of the social eco-feminist argument that a life centered on productivity threatens the sustainability of all life forms on a planet, and the planet itself. Within the first few scenes of WALL-E, one sees that all signs of vegetation and human life are gone. The only being that remains is WALL-E, a waste allocation system whose sole job is to organize heaps of trash into neat trash piles. Since the world has accumulated so much waste due to the overabundance of production, humans and other life forms have no place left to live and reproduce. To solve this problem, they literally take to the skies and build a space station, abandoning the earth for an artificial world that they can create.

Through this logic one can see the inherent flaw that eco-social feminist see in centering the world on productivity-the lack of concern for the condition of life. When structuring a world around production, reproduction, and thereby the quality of life becomes secondary to the idea that what can be destroyed can be recreated. In WALL-E’s case, since the earth is destroyed, the world can hence be recreated in favor of pioneering a new, better world in space. What becomes lost, (the bio-diversity of crops, animals, generations of people whom may not have been able to afford a trip to space), all become the necessary and consequential means to the end of a new future model. Social eco-feminists argue that it is by this capitalist structure that life becomes reasonable to exploit. Instead of focusing on “people’s needs,” WALL-E’s version of earth displays how the focus of “people’s greed,” subjects an entire planet to barrenness.

By sending EVA, the female voiced vegetation allocator machine, to search out for retrieval of plant life on Earth, eco-socialists would argue that her assignment is representative of the gender role bias associated with nature-women nurture, and man destructs. Since eco-social feminists do not believe in hierarchies or dualisms of power as valid structural claims to society, all roles, even gender roles become abolished on behalf of sustaining a socially just environment. Even though some feminists argue that nature and women have only been subjected to exploitation due to the westernized and mechanistic thought of man, (and therefore only women should liberate nature), eco-social feminists believe that it is just as exploitive to exclude men from fixing the problems that their structures created. By assuming only women have the power; feminists are only fueling the gender bias that women are biologically programmed and responsible for the entire environment.

However, it is not EVA that finds the plant, but WALL-E; who only gives the plant to EVA because he thinks that it’d be a gift that could make EVA fall in love with him. Therefore WALL-E not only reverses the gender bias assumption that women’s role is to be biologically responsible for the existence and reproduction of life, but also displays how emotional connections can restore the quality and reverence of life. Although cultural and liberal eco-feminists would argue that it is still EVA that holds the plant in her stomach, and thereby is still inherently filled and responsible for life, it is the cause behind this, that nature is only found to be preserved by an act of love that this claim can be superseded. Therefore, WALL-E promotes the sustainability of life based on the true definition of eco-social feminism-the leveled connection between two sexes, two life forms, based on consideration and not exploitation.

Although Stanton did not intend to write a movie with an environmental message, it becomes clear that his characters’ environment became victimized by not only the product of its people, but the ignorance of people acting as products. Since people are focused on the product of the future, (the space station), the Earth becomes desolated. When people arrive at the space station, their only means of communication is through a plug connecting them to a television screen that connects another face to another screen, in an attempt to mirror a human conversation. By separating the humans from humane connection between each other, Stanton creates characters that are products of technology, not people. It is only when technology steps in-WALL-E and EVA, having first experienced the human connection of love, that the space station becomes unplugged and the character recognize their own artificial recreation of life. Once the humans face each other again, their desire to rebuild the vegetation, and Earth in general, emerges as well. Stanton exemplifies how eco-socialist feminists view that human relations between each other have a direct correlation between their environments.

While there are no robots alive today capable of falling in love to demonstrate to humans the power of its potential, WALL-E still produces a relevant eco-social feminist message to today’s audiences- the only means to saving the environment, is through reestablishing humane connections to each other, and branching out that idea of considerate compassion to the land that we inhabit if we ever hope to sustain the existence of our planet.

Merchant, Carol. Radical Ecology. New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall Inc, 1992.

Suggested Reading from Inquiries Journal

Game Changer—any person, institution, or event whose action significantly alters the current environment and status quo—for better or for worse.  They come in many different shapes and sizes; from presidents to technological giants such as Apple, or a baseball play where the runner steals home to win the series.  Regardless of their area of concentration, these actions and events shape the course of history. ... MORE»
This paper explores the role that ecosystems can have in the decision making framework for urban air pollution mitigation in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. The focus is on management planning of green roof implementation to mitigate the effects of urban air pollution. The importance of Toronto's impact on surrounding ecosystems, conservation... MORE»
Near the end of 2015, in the midst of recent presidential and congressional debates, House Republicans proposed a bill to defund Planned Parenthood, blocking all of the organization’s federal funding, after the release... MORE»
 Overpopulation is often seen as the cause of China’s environmental problems. Those who support this theory argue that China cannot cope with the recent rapid growth in distributing resources to its population. This coupled with recent estimates about the continued growth of the nation create alarming forecasts for the resilience and sustainability of China’s environment. Robert Solow characterizes sustainability as “an injunction... MORE»
Submit to Inquiries Journal, Get a Decision in 10-Days

Inquiries Journal provides undergraduate and graduate students around the world a platform for the wide dissemination of academic work over a range of core disciplines.

Representing the work of students from hundreds of institutions around the globe, Inquiries Journal's large database of academic articles is completely free. Learn more | Blog | Submit

Follow IJ

Latest in Environmental Studies

2021, Vol. 13 No. 09
After thousands of years of innovation, humankind has shaped the modern world into a new planetary epoch: the Anthropocene. This paper connects the human propensity to carve our comfortable, convenient civilizations into our local environments with... Read Article »
2020, Vol. 12 No. 09
Though electronic products are ubiquitous in the modern Western world, most people are not aware of the origins of the batteries that power devices such as laptop computers and mobile phones. Lithium-ion batteries, though used primarily in wealthy... Read Article »
2017, Vol. 9 No. 12
Climate change is already altering our biosphere and is projected to bring about monumental changes to our planet’s environment, changes which are unprecedented in human history. Numerous social groups have drawn upon a wide assortment of... Read Article »
2017, Vol. 9 No. 05
Is it possible to objectively define the Anthropocene? This essay argues that whether or not it is precisely definable as a geological epoch, its true value, as a concept grounded in futurity, lies within the social realm. The origins of the term... Read Article »
2013, Vol. 3 No. 1
Published by Clocks and Clouds
Postmaterialist values, those that emphasize higher-order human needs, have become widely accepted as the determining force behind environmentalism in the West. Little research has been dedicated to studying the importance of these values outside... Read Article »
2017, Vol. 9 No. 03
In Gallup’s 2016 environment poll, 64 percent of U.S. adults are now worried a “great deal” or “fair amount” about global warming, with a record 65 percent attributing warming primarily to human activities (1). These... Read Article »
2016, Vol. 6 No. 1
Despite all the information we have regarding climate change and the potential perils of continuing on our path of consumption, people are slow to make the necessary changes. Our tendency to live habitually and the dampening effect continuous negative... Read Article »

What are you looking for?


"Should I Go to Graduate School?"
How to Select a Graduate Research Advisor
How to Manage a Group Project (Video)