<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>'Third Way' - Tagged Articles - Inquiries Journal</title>
    <link>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/keyword/third-way</link>
    <description>Inquiries Journal provides undergraduate and graduate students around the world a platform for the wide dissemination of academic work over a range of core disciplines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 09:14:22 -0400</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 09:14:22 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
			<item>
				<title>Why Being Third Isn&#39;t Good Enough: A Critique of the &#39;Third Way&#39;</title>
				<link>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1151/why-being-third-isnt-good-enough-a-critique-of-the-third-way</link>
				<description>By Peter  Hand - For a government so keen on &amp;lsquo;sound-bite&amp;rsquo; over substance, gimmicks  over values and image over principle, the early indications were, that  this was a government void of any real beliefs.  Apart from a desire to  win &amp;ndash; a means in itself &amp;ndash; it has been very difficult to pinpoint what  exactly is this government&amp;rsquo;s philosophy.  This indeed has been the case  from the &amp;lsquo;peoples&amp;rsquo; Prime Minster&amp;rsquo;, to the people themselves.  For  example, we started off with &amp;lsquo;Cool Britannia&amp;rsquo;, designed to represent the  &amp;lsquo;new&amp;rsquo; spirit of this Labour government...</description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 1999 12:00 EST</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1151/why-being-third-isnt-good-enough-a-critique-of-the-third-way</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>In Defence of The Third Way: A Response to Peter Hand</title>
				<link>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1125/in-defence-of-the-third-way-a-response-to-peter-hand</link>
				<description>By Paul  Williams And Rob Dixon - In Issue 53 of Interstate, Peter Hand argued that the &amp;lsquo;Third  Way&amp;rsquo; was nothing but a well packaged combination of rhetoric and  soundbites on the part of a government wholly obsessed by presentation.[1] Given the constraints of space we will limit ourselves to primarily  responding to Hand&amp;rsquo;s agenda by contesting four of the central themes of  his &amp;ldquo;argument&amp;rdquo;. However, it is sometimes difficult to flesh out the  assumptions and lines of argument Hand was making because of his own  indulgence in &amp;lsquo;soundbite over substance&amp;rsquo;. The four themes we wish to  contest...</description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 1999 12:00 EST</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1125/in-defence-of-the-third-way-a-response-to-peter-hand</guid>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
