<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>'Science Communication' - Tagged Articles - Inquiries Journal</title>
    <link>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/keyword/science-communication</link>
    <description>Inquiries Journal provides undergraduate and graduate students around the world a platform for the wide dissemination of academic work over a range of core disciplines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 14:54:36 -0400</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 14:54:36 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
			<item>
				<title>The CRISPR Fantasy: Flaws in Current Metaphors of Gene-Modifying Technology</title>
				<link>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1422/the-crispr-fantasy-flaws-in-current-metaphors-of-gene-modifying-technology</link>
				<description>By Alex J. Maben - CRISPR gene-modifying technology continues to  revolutionize fields involving biological research. Rapid advancements,  however, have sparked a vibrant bioethical debate scene. This research focuses  on the effective usage of CRISPR metaphors in scientific communication. Specifically,  I argue that the current figurative terminology&amp;mdash;gene editing, targeting, scissors, etc.&amp;mdash;exhibit underlying  oversimplifications that bias public perspectives on CRISPR. Though the actual  experimental science occurs in lab, the world learns about the discoveries  through literary expression. It is thus...</description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:59 EDT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1422/the-crispr-fantasy-flaws-in-current-metaphors-of-gene-modifying-technology</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Weight of Evidence Reporting: Pragmatic Optimism or a Bad Idea?</title>
				<link>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1248/weight-of-evidence-reporting-pragmatic-optimism-or-a-bad-idea</link>
				<description>By Alexander E. Hopkins - While some believe that scientists should communicate their research apolitically in research journals, others believe that scientists should communicate to the media in order to bring awareness to their research topic. As a compromise to these two views, Professor Sharon Dunwoody proposed &quot;weight of evidence&quot; reporting to bridge this gap between the objectivity of science and the subjectivity of the media. The goal of weight of evidence reporting is to create highly pragmatic media consumers that will be allowed to arrive at scientifically-sound, objective conclusions based upon data. However...</description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 10:40 EDT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1248/weight-of-evidence-reporting-pragmatic-optimism-or-a-bad-idea</guid>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
