<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>'Public Diplomacy' - Tagged Articles - Inquiries Journal</title>
    <link>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/keyword/public-diplomacy</link>
    <description>Inquiries Journal provides undergraduate and graduate students around the world a platform for the wide dissemination of academic work over a range of core disciplines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 09:16:22 -0400</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 09:16:22 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
			<item>
				<title>Tracing the Success of Soft Power in the US State Department&#39;s Future Leaders Exchange Program</title>
				<link>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1659/tracing-the-success-of-soft-power-in-the-us-state-departments-future-leaders-exchange-program</link>
				<description>By Leyla R. Latypova - The United States government started exploring the soft power potential of student and scholar exchange programs as early as 1908, with the establishment of the Boxer Indemnity Scholarship Program.[1] The father of the theory of soft power, Joseph Nye, was not even born when Edmund James, then president of the University of Illinois, outlined precisely the soft power benefits of the student exchange in his letter to president Franklin D. Roosevelt. James wrote, &amp;ldquo;The nation which succeeds in educating the young Chinese of the present generation will be the nation which, for a given expenditure...</description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:42 EDT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1659/tracing-the-success-of-soft-power-in-the-us-state-departments-future-leaders-exchange-program</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Government Public Relations: Public Diplomacy or Propaganda?</title>
				<link>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1012/government-public-relations-public-diplomacy-or-propaganda</link>
				<description>By Alexander E. Hopkins - This dilemma proves to be more complicated to identify in our modern era. In addition to the telecommunications revolution, the worldwide spread of democracy, market economies, and digital communications has led to a more globalized world, thus allowing multiple, competing media channels to take root (Kovacs, 2006, p. 430; Signitzer &amp;amp; Wamser, 2005, p. 435). This digital environment, which suggests terms such as collective good and public interest, has ambiguous meanings, especially when determining whether a government or an outside organization is conveying the message (Gregory, 2005, pp....</description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2015 04:58 EDT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1012/government-public-relations-public-diplomacy-or-propaganda</guid>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
