<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>'Military Strategy' - Tagged Articles - Inquiries Journal</title>
    <link>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/keyword/military-strategy</link>
    <description>Inquiries Journal provides undergraduate and graduate students around the world a platform for the wide dissemination of academic work over a range of core disciplines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:01:51 -0400</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:01:51 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
			<item>
				<title>When Trying to Surprise Your Opponents Backfires: Exposing the Weaknesses of the Indirect Approach</title>
				<link>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1647/when-trying-to-surprise-your-opponents-backfires-exposing-the-weaknesses-of-the-indirect-approach</link>
				<description>By Joshua  Schwartz - It is often thought that great military strategists do not engage in simple, frontal assaults, but instead devise complex plans meant to deceive, manipulate, and surprise their enemies. However, do such strategies always lead to victory? If not, what are some of the reasons why they fail to? In order to answer these questions, this paper will examine one such strategy known as the &quot;indirect approach,&quot; which was developed by Basil Liddell Hart, a famous British historian and military strategist. The main concept of the indirect approach is that the optimal military strategy is to position your...</description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 12:00 EDT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1647/when-trying-to-surprise-your-opponents-backfires-exposing-the-weaknesses-of-the-indirect-approach</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Reevaluating Military Strategy: The Effectiveness Of Conventional Deterrence</title>
				<link>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1565/reevaluating-military-strategy-the-effectiveness-of-conventional-deterrence</link>
				<description>By Dan  Fitzgerald - The rise of modernized and efficient militaries competing for dominance against the United States&#39; military has resulted in increased eruptions of conflict globally. A majority of decisions by the Joint Chiefs and EUCOM about long-term U.S. military policy in these areas are currently being based off personal and historical observations, along with blatant speculation. The question that should be asked before formulating these positions is if crisis management techniques, like conventional force movement, have a positive effect on the response to crisis triggers. The aim of this research is to...</description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2016 12:00 EST</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1565/reevaluating-military-strategy-the-effectiveness-of-conventional-deterrence</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The State&#39;s Struggle to Master Asymmetrical Warfare</title>
				<link>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1610/the-states-struggle-to-master-asymmetrical-warfare</link>
				<description>By Joe  Wisniewski - The only way to truly study asymmetrical warfare is to take into account its long history. Thus, this paper utilizes a dataset that contains almost two hundred wars fought since 1817 in order to measure the relationship between the duration of asymmetrical war and the state&#39;s chances of victory. The results showcased little difference in the state&#39;s percentage of victory for short and medium length wars. For wars over three years, the chances of victory for the state plunged by thirty-one percent. This &quot;three year switch&quot; fits into existing models on how terrorism is effectively evolving to combat...</description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:00 EST</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1610/the-states-struggle-to-master-asymmetrical-warfare</guid>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
