<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>'George W. Bush Presidency' - Tagged Articles - Inquiries Journal</title>
    <link>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/keyword/george-w.-bush-presidency</link>
    <description>Inquiries Journal provides undergraduate and graduate students around the world a platform for the wide dissemination of academic work over a range of core disciplines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 21:24:45 -0400</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 21:24:45 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
			<item>
				<title>The Bush Administration and Torture: Who is Responsible for the Abuse at Abu Ghraib?</title>
				<link>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1070/the-bush-administration-and-torture-who-is-responsible-for-the-abuse-at-abu-ghraib</link>
				<description>By Erik  Eriksen - Since first becoming public in March 2004,1 the case of the detainee abuse at the Abu Ghraib Prison2 has gained widespread interest and an important place in debates on the Iraq War. At the prison, systematic abuse of detainees, described as &amp;lsquo;sadistic, blatant, and wanton&amp;rsquo;, was perpetrated by military police guards.3 The guards beat prisoners; intimidated them with unmuzzled dogs; placed hooded detainees in a pyramid; carried out a range of incidents of abuse with sexual themes; and humiliated them in many other degrading ways.4 These actions are widely regarded as unlawful.5 While...</description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 07:58 EST</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1070/the-bush-administration-and-torture-who-is-responsible-for-the-abuse-at-abu-ghraib</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Diverging Discontent:  Examining the PATRIOT Act&#39;s Passage in Congress Under the Bush Administration</title>
				<link>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/709/diverging-discontent-examining-the-patriot-acts-passage-in-congress-under-the-bush-administration</link>
				<description>By Alexander E. Hopkins - On October 26, 2001, President George W. Bush signed the USA PATRIOT Act in response to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. The Act, by Congress just six weeks after the attacks with virtually no public debate, greatly-expanded the executive branch&amp;rsquo;s power to investigate possible domestic terrorism (Cheney, 2005, p. 1717; Chang, 2001). Rather than create new laws, existing laws were strengthened. However, members of Congress were still alarmed at possible civil liberties violations (Cheney, 2005, p. 1717; Seamon &amp;amp; Gardner, 2005, p. 321). Like many war-time Presidents, such as Woodrow...</description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 08:24 EDT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/709/diverging-discontent-examining-the-patriot-acts-passage-in-congress-under-the-bush-administration</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The Constitutionality of the Patriot Act: Examining Section 213</title>
				<link>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/622/the-constitutionality-of-the-patriot-act-examining-section-213</link>
				<description>By Jeremy D. Bailie - In the aftermath of September 11, Congress was eager to put laws on the books to prevent another attack. In an unprecedented spirit of bipartisan patriotism, a law was passed in the House by 357 to 66 (Clerk of the House) and in the Senate by 98 to 1 (Secretary of the Senate). The title of the act, USA PATRIOT Act, is an acronym for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. Since its historic passage there has been much debate on the constitutionality of the act. Some would claim the Legislative and Executive branches acted opportunistically...</description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:59 EDT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/622/the-constitutionality-of-the-patriot-act-examining-section-213</guid>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>George Bush and No Child Left Behind: A Federalist Perspective</title>
				<link>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/258/george-bush-and-no-child-left-behind-a-federalist-perspective</link>
				<description>By Rachel S. McCloskey - President George Bush came into office in 2001 after both a campaign and outcome that shook the nation. Following the controversial Presidential election results, George W. Bush promised the American people that he was the right person to do this challenging job, acting as the next President of the United States. He wholeheartedly believed that his fierce agenda and revamped outlook on conservatism would create benefits to all across the United States. Through his strong Republican ideals a stronger country would be the product. President Bush campaigned under the slogan &amp;ldquo;A uniter, not a...</description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:11 EDT</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/258/george-bush-and-no-child-left-behind-a-federalist-perspective</guid>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
